She cites the example of Coca-Cola using “hand geometry” to stop workers from “buddy-punching” a late coworker’s time card. In 1997, Ann Davis wrote an article called “The Body as Password” in Wired, pointing out the many ways the body was already being decoded. Startups and established technology companies alike have expanded their research into identifying the parts of the body and kinds of behavior that make people uniquely identifiable. For them-and for many other organizations-alternative kinds of algorithmic surveillance are springing up to work in tandem with FR, or to take its place, particularly in cities or regions where a moratorium on FR has been imposed. Some police forces may not want to find themselves ensnared in the same kind of costly legal battle that the South Wales Police fought for years. The consequences of a narrow focus on FR are already visible. It also doesn’t account for the many other ways that our physical bodies make us legible to systems of surveillance. But legislation that attempts to eliminate only one kind of harm-such as the use of facial recognition by law enforcement-can lead to workarounds, particularly as private companies are not subject to such limitations. One such bill, introduced by Democratic lawmakers in the United States, would also ban federal agencies from using or spending money on gait recognition and voice recognition without the explicit authorization of Congress, and it would impose financial penalties on states that don’t pass their own bans. Legislative attempts to push back against surveillance tech are in the works outside of the UK too, and some are more expansive in their targets. But the South Wales Police force has indicated that they will continue to use their system, with the chief constable Matt Jukes saying that he was “ confident this is a judgement we can work with.” Facial recognition has been the subject of much scrutiny and regulation in the UK, a man named Ed Bridges took the South Wales Police to court over the use of automated facial recognition and won. ![]() It may seem like an overreach for a provincial police force to roll out a nebulous new technology, even the description of which sounds sinister, but I’ve started to think there is a less obvious reason behind their choice. All that the police force knows is that they want to use it. Lincolnshire’s police and crime commissioner, Marc Jones, secured funding from the UK Home Office for this project, but the exact system that the police will use, and its exact supplier, are still not confirmed. In Lincolnshire, England, the local police force has indicated that they will be testing out a kind of “emotion recognition” technology on CCTV footage which they collect around Gainsborough, a town in the county.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |